Cases / Law, regulation and treaties · Australia · 2013–2018
Queensland loosened vegetation clearing rules, then reintroduced them in 2018
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
Queensland relaxed its vegetation clearing laws in 2013 and reintroduced them in 2018 to reduce clearance rates. At stake is vegetation cover; about 400,000 hectares were reported cleared in 2015 to 2016.
What?
Queensland loosened vegetation clearing laws in 2013 and reintroduced them in 2018 Clayton Utz
Where?
Queensland, Australia Clayton Utz
When?
2013 to 2018 Clayton Utz
Who?
Gained
None on recordLost
None on recordHarmed
None on recordWhy?
The 2018 reintroduction was aimed at reducing clearance rates. Clayton Utz
How?
Changes to state vegetation clearing laws Clayton Utz
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who
What happened
The record, in order.
Queensland loosened its vegetation clearing laws in 2013, according to Clayton Utz [0].
Clayton Utz reported that the laws were reintroduced in 2018 to reduce clearance rates [0].
In court and with insurers
Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.
Lawsuits and rulings
No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.
Insurers
No insurer decision on record.
What we don't know
Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Record
- None on record The figure of about 400,000 hectares cleared in 2015 to 2016 has no source link in the sources reviewed.
- None on record The reasons for the 2013 loosening are not stated in the sources reviewed.
- None on record Who gained from the clearing is not stated.
- None on record A 2025 EDO (edo.org.au) link on Queensland environment reforms is listed without a description and is not used.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Voices on record: ✓ Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers
Company or project
- To clear or not to clearClayton Utz · 2018-03