Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Fishing ban · Canada · 1954–2025

Newfoundland and Labrador community resettlement programmes

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured. Disputed
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 6 insufficient · 1 not measured · 2 disputed See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
Is the northern cod stock recovered enough for the 2025 quota?
  • Government and regulators Fisheries and Oceans Canada: Announced an increase to 38,000 tonnes in June 2025, in a release titled as a sustainable increase in the northern cod total allowable catch. Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  • Researchers Scientists quoted by Canadian Press (via Barchart): The report is headlined that scientists question Ottawa more than doubling the cod catch in Newfoundland and Labrador. Barchart
  • Press and investigations The Narwhal / The Conversation: The 2023 stock was about 12 per cent of 1960s biomass. The Narwhal / The Conversation

Since the 1950s the province has paid residents of small coastal communities to move, and in recent decades it has weighed each closure against twenty years of service costs. The northern cod fishery, banned from 1992, reopened in 2024 under a quota that critics questioned.

CAD 270,000Households' maximum resettlement payment under the current rules, per household
Payment is per household, not per person; 250,000, 260,000 or 270,000 depending on household size (provincial FAQ).

Status As of the latest dated source (June 2025): the province's 2021 resettlement rules apply and the northern cod quota stands at 38,000 tonnes; no court ruling or review found in the sources.

What?
Provincial programmes that pay residents of small, mostly coastal communities to relocate, evaluated against the cost of keeping services running; run alongside the 1992 cod ban and the 2024 reopening. The Globe and Mail
Where?
Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada; Little Bay Islands, Notre Dame Bay. The Globe and Mail
When?
Programmes from 1954; current rules from 2021; cod ban from 1992 to June 2024. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador
Who?
Gained
  • Provincial government — Avoids service costs it calculated over 20 years, for example CAD 3.8 million for Little Bay Islands and CAD 7.9 million for William's Harbour The Globe and Mail
Lost
Harmed
Why?
The 1965 programme's written aim was to move people from small coastal villages and build a working fishing industry; the current rules weigh payments against 20 years of service costs. R. Blake
How?
Residents vote; if the required share agrees (now 75 per cent of permanent residents) and the province's calculation shows net savings, households receive payments and services end. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Newfoundland and Labrador has run programmes that pay residents of small coastal communities to leave since the 1950s. The first programme (1954 to 1965) paid families CAD 150 and later CAD 600, and paid only if the whole community agreed. A joint federal-provincial Fisherman's Household Resettlement Program followed in 1965, paying up to CAD 1,000 per household, CAD 200 per household member and up to CAD 3,000 for a serviced lot, with an approval threshold of 90 per cent and later 80 per cent. Raymond Blake, writing in Newfoundland and Labrador Studies in 2015, reports that the programme's written aim was to move people out of small coastal villages and build a working fishing industry suited to the twentieth century. People were directed to 77 designated growth centres. The Globe and Mail put the number of communities resettled at 279.

The record on outcomes is mixed. The Canadian Encyclopedia describes the programme as generally regarded as unsuccessful, notes that many industries in the growth centres failed, and says resettled people lost their fishing livelihoods. Blake reports that, in a 1970 official survey, the share of households on social assistance was 11.7 per cent before moving and 6.9 per cent after, and that in the first year only 25 per cent of households chose a growth centre. His own family received a cheque of CAD 2,428 in 1969; at the destination a lot cost CAD 3,500 to 4,000 and a house about CAD 12,000, and the families made up the difference.

The current policy was set by successive provincial rules. In 2016 the government tied the cost-benefit calculation to 10, 15 or 20 years depending on the age profile of the community and stated that no services would be provided to those who stayed. In October 2021 it lowered the approval threshold to 75 per cent, fixed the calculation at 20 years, and required net savings to the province of around CAD 10 million for an assessment to proceed. The 2021 rules also removed care-home residents from the definition of permanent resident, which governs both the vote and the payment. Under the provincial FAQ, payments are CAD 250,000, 260,000 or 270,000 per household depending on its size; an adult permanent resident without property receives CAD 10,000; a cottage owner receives nothing and may go to the property at their own expense and risk. For William's Harbour in 2017 the government stated a cost of about CAD 4 million and 20-year savings of CAD 7.9 million.

Little Bay Islands, in Notre Dame Bay, is the community the sources follow most closely. The Globe and Mail reported in 2017 that the village once had about 600 people, 11 shops, three churches, a school and a doctor, and that 38 people, mostly elderly, remained. The collapse began with the cod fishing ban of 1992; the fish plant closed in 2011 and the school in 2018. The province offered CAD 250,000 to 270,000 per household if 90 per cent of residents agreed, and had calculated that the move would save about CAD 3.8 million over 20 years. The village formally closed at the end of 2019. An 86-year-old resident told the paper she was not happy to leave and would have chosen to stay for life, but knew that was not possible.

Commercial cod fishing reopened in June 2024 with a quota of 18,000 tonnes, about four and a half years after Little Bay Islands closed. Global Seafood Alliance reported a 62 to 76 per cent risk of the stock shrinking over 2024 to 2027. The 2023 stock was about 12 per cent of its 1960s biomass according to The Narwhal. In June 2025 Fisheries and Oceans Canada announced an increase to 38,000 tonnes and described it as sustainable; a Canadian Press report (via Barchart) carried the headline that scientists questioned the more than doubling of the catch.

  1. 1954First resettlement programme: CAD 150, later CAD 600 per family, paid only if the whole community agreed
  2. 1965Fisherman's Household Resettlement Program: up to CAD 1,000 per household, CAD 200 per member, CAD 3,000 for a serviced lot; approval threshold 90%, later 80%
  3. 1969Resettled family receives CAD 2,428; lot at destination CAD 3,500 to 4,000, house about CAD 12,000 (Blake)
  4. 1970Official survey: households on social assistance 11.7% before moving, 6.9% after (Blake)
  5. 1992Cod fishing ban begins; Little Bay Islands begins to decline
  6. 2011Little Bay Islands fish plant closes
  7. 2016Provincial rules: cost-benefit over 10, 15 or 20 years; threshold 90%; payment up to CAD 270,000
  8. 2017Globe and Mail: Little Bay Islands has 38 residents; William's Harbour assessed at about CAD 4 million cost, CAD 7.9 million 20-year savings
  9. 2019Little Bay Islands formally closes at the end of the year
  10. 2021Provincial rules: threshold 75%, 20-year calculation, net savings of around CAD 10 million required, care-home residents excluded
  11. 2024Commercial cod fishing reopens in June with an 18,000 tonne quota
  12. 2025Quota raised to 38,000 tonnes (18 June); scientists question the increase

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Is the northern cod stock recovered enough for the 2025 quota?
Government and regulators
Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Announced an increase to 38,000 tonnes in June 2025, in a release titled as a sustainable increase in the northern cod total allowable catch.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Researchers
Scientists quoted by Canadian Press (via Barchart)

The report is headlined that scientists question Ottawa more than doubling the cod catch in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Barchart
Press and investigations
The Narwhal / The Conversation

The 2023 stock was about 12 per cent of 1960s biomass.

The Narwhal / The Conversation
Did the 1960s resettlement leave households better off?
Researchers
Canadian Encyclopedia (R. Pitt)

The programme is generally regarded as unsuccessful; many growth-centre industries failed and resettled people lost their fishing livelihoods.

The Canadian Encyclopedia (R. Pitt)
Researchers
Raymond Blake, Newfoundland and Labrador Studies

A 1970 official survey found social assistance fell from 11.7 per cent of households before moving to 6.9 per cent after; his own family covered the gap between the cheque and destination costs.

R. Blake

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • Payments of CAD 150 to 600 per family (1954-65) were paid only if the whole community agreed
    • 1965 programme: up to CAD 1,000 per household, CAD 200 per member, CAD 3,000 for a serviced lot; threshold 90%, then 80%
    • Programme described as generally unsuccessful; many growth-centre industries failed and resettled people lost fishing livelihoods
    • 2016 rules: cost-benefit over 10, 15 or 20 years; no services for those who stay
    • 2021 rules: threshold 75%; 20-year calculation; net savings of around CAD 10 million required; care-home residents excluded from the definition of permanent resident
    • Current payment CAD 250,000, 260,000 or 270,000 per household; adult without property CAD 10,000; cottage owners nothing
    • Little Bay Islands: about 600 people formerly, 38 in 2017; province calculated CAD 3.8 million savings over 20 years
    • Northern cod quota 38,000 tonnes announced 18 June 2025

    Who gained

    Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

    Reached nature or the ground

    Not published
    No figure published.

    Gained elsewhere

    Not totalled
    Currency: CAD · Window: . All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

    Responses on record

    • Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (2021-10-27): Set the resettlement approval threshold at 75 per cent, fixed the cost-benefit period at 20 years and required net savings of around CAD 10 million for an assessment (release of 27 October 2021). · Government of Newfoundland and Labrador
    • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (2025-06-18): Announced an increase in the northern cod total allowable catch to 38,000 tonnes and described it as sustainable (release of 18 June 2025). · Fisheries and Oceans Canada

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What nature saw

    Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

    Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

    Northern cod stock, 2023
    About 12%
    Of 1960s biomass (The Narwhal / The Conversation)
    Commercial quota
    18,000 t, then 38,000 t
    June 2024 and June 2025 (Global Seafood Alliance; Fisheries and Oceans Canada)
    Risk of stock shrinking, 2024 to 2027
    62 to 76%
    As reported by Global Seafood Alliance

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
    • Disputed Is the northern cod stock recovered enough for the 2025 quota?

    Accounts

    • Disputed Did the 1960s resettlement leave households better off?

    Record

    • None on record The official pages do not say whether the future service costs counted in the 20-year calculation are discounted to present value.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: the 1992 cod ban cost about 30,000 jobs in the province and the stock stood at about 1 per cent of its historic peak at the time (secondary summaries only).
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: Fisheries and Oceans Canada had asked for a quota of 13,000 tonnes in 2024 and political advisers described the higher quota as a political win; Oceans North recommended 15,300 tonnes; a former departmental modeller, Noel Cadigan, said he saw no evidence the 2025 quota was sustainable.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: Nippers Harbour voted 98 per cent to move in 2013 and was refused after the province calculated that staying would be CAD 4.4 million cheaper over 20 years; Gaultois, with a stated moving cost of CAD 10,051,000 and ferry costs of about CAD 940,000 a year, declined in 2023; the programme has no separate budget line; Tilt Cove's last four residents left in 2025.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: Little Bay Islands voted 89.47 per cent in 2015, below the 90 per cent threshold; communities closed since 2002 include Great Harbour Deep, Petites, Big Brook, Grand Bruit, Round Harbour, William's Harbour and Snook's Arm.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: the stock model was updated in October 2023 with data back to 1954 and a capelin index; the stock was then judged outside the critical zone, with a 29 per cent probability of being in it.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: in 2013 the payment rose from CAD 100,000 to CAD 270,000 per household with a 90 per cent vote, and services including electricity are cut after a move.

    Did the harm stop?

    The 1992 cod ban lasted until the commercial reopening in June 2024. The resettlement rules remained in force under the 2021 revision.

    Who paid?

    Under the current rules the province pays the household payments from public funds. According to Blake, resettled families in the 1960s bore the gap between the cheque and destination costs. Residents who remain in a closed community lose provincial services, and cottage owners receive no payment.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project✓ Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society✓ Researchers

    Government and regulators

    1. News release, 29 November 2016
      Government of Newfoundland and Labrador · 2016-11-29
    2. News release, 27 October 2021
      Government of Newfoundland and Labrador · 2021-10-27
    3. Community relocation: frequently asked questions
      Government of Newfoundland and Labrador · n.d.
    4. News release, 15 August 2017
      Government of Newfoundland and Labrador · 2017-08-15
    5. Canada announces a sustainable increase in northern cod TAC
      Fisheries and Oceans Canada · 2025-06-18

    Researchers

    1. Newfoundland Resettlement Program
      The Canadian Encyclopedia (R. Pitt) · 2006 (updated 2015)

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

    Science and environment

    Biomass, root-to-shoot ratio, carbon fraction
    Biomass is the dry weight of living plants per hectare. The root-to-shoot ratio adds the weight of roots. The carbon fraction is the share of that weight that is carbon, about 47% in tropical forests.