Cases / Law, regulation and treaties · United Kingdom · 2012
Affordable share of London Olympic Park-area homes reached 27%, below 35% target
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
The regeneration around the London 2012 Olympic Park built 13,259 homes, 27 per cent of them affordable against a 35 per cent target, the Big Issue reported. The sources reviewed do not describe the park's effect on nature.
What?
The Olympic Park area regeneration built 13,259 homes, 27 per cent affordable against a 35 per cent target, the Big Issue reported. Big Issue
Where?
Olympic Park and surrounding area, east London, United Kingdom Big Issue
When?
Olympic Park regeneration around the 2012 Games; the Big Issue figures are undated
Who?
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Housing built under the Olympic Park regeneration, with an affordable share target. Big Issue
6 of 6 questions answered from the record
What happened
The record, in order.
The Big Issue reported that 13,259 homes built in and around the Olympic Park had 27 per cent affordable provision, against a target of 35 per cent.
A 2013 article in the journal City reported that Carpenters Estate residents felt the regeneration was not for them.
The same article reported that 777 affordable tenancies were lost at Clays Lane and traveller sites.
In court and with insurers
Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.
Lawsuits and rulings
No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.
Insurers
No insurer decision on record.
What we don't know
Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Record
- None on record The Big Issue figures are undated; the sources reviewed do not say when they were measured.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not describe the park's ecological outcomes.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not name the developers or public bodies responsible for the housing.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society✓ Researchers