Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Protected area / relocation · Libya · 1995–2023

Libya: Qubeiba Beach nesting site demolished for a power plant near Sirte; turtle programme interrupted

Nature's voice · report
The National reports that in 2009 construction of a power plant near Sirte demolished my Qubeiba Beach, one of Libya's most active nesting sites. The National
Did nature suffer? Yes. Harm is on record.
Recorded
  • My Qubeiba Beach, described by The National as one of Libya's most active nesting sites, was demolished in 2009 during construction of a power plant near Sirte. The National
  • 358 nests were recorded at five beaches near Sirte in 2009, according to MEDASSET. MEDASSET
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 disputed See the gaps

In 2009 construction of a power plant near Sirte demolished Qubeiba Beach, which The National described in 2023 as one of Libya's most active nesting sites. A UN-funded turtle programme was interrupted by conflict, and volunteers continue without funding.

Demolished in 2009 for a power plantQubeiba Beach
Described by The National (2023) as one of Libya's most active nesting sites.

Status As of April 2023 (latest source): the UN-funded programme had been interrupted by conflict and volunteers were continuing without funding; the plant owner and the area of Qubeiba lost are not on record.

What?
Construction of a power plant near Sirte in 2009 demolished Qubeiba Beach, described as one of Libya's most active nesting sites; a UN-funded turtle programme was later interrupted by conflict. The National
Where?
Libya, near Sirte. The National
When?
1995 (first surveys), 2005 (programme launched), 2009 (beach demolished), 2023 (The National report). The National
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
None on record
Harmed
  • Loggerhead nesting at Qubeiba Beach — The beach was demolished in 2009; 358 nests were recorded at five beaches near Sirte that year The National
Why?
A power plant was built on the beach; the plant operator is not named in the sources reviewed. The National
How?
Through construction of the plant, which demolished the beach. The National
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Surveys in 1995 found 342 crawl tracks and 176 nests between the Egyptian border and Sirte. The Libyan Sea Turtle Programme was launched in 2005. MEDASSET records 550 nests in 2006 and 841 in 2007 at 28 beaches, and 358 nests in 2009 at five beaches near Sirte.

In 2009 construction of a power plant near Sirte demolished Qubeiba Beach, described by The National in 2023 as one of Libya's most active nesting sites. The plant operator is not named in the sources reviewed.

A UN-funded turtle programme was interrupted by conflict, and volunteers continue without funding. The National reports 494 nests on one stretch in 2022 against 271 in 2011. A volunteer told The National: "We are tackling a problem that the state has been unable to solve."

  1. 1995Surveys find 342 crawl tracks and 176 nests between the Egyptian border and Sirte
  2. 2005Libyan Sea Turtle Programme launched
  3. 2009Construction of a power plant near Sirte demolishes Qubeiba Beach; 358 nests recorded at five beaches near Sirte (MEDASSET)
  4. 2022494 nests on one stretch, against 271 in 2011 (The National)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“We are tackling a problem that the state has been unable to solve.”

A volunteer working on the turtle programme, to The National · April 2023 · The National

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • Surveys in 1995 found 342 crawl tracks and 176 nests between the Egyptian border and Sirte.
    • MEDASSET records 550 nests in 2006 and 841 in 2007 at 28 beaches, and 358 nests in 2009 at five beaches near Sirte.
    • The National (April 2023): construction of a power plant near Sirte in 2009 demolished Qubeiba Beach, described as one of Libya's most active nesting sites.
    • The National (April 2023): a UN-funded programme was interrupted by conflict; volunteers continue without funding.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What nature saw

    Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

    Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

    Nests, one stretch
    494 (2022) vs 271 (2011)
    The National
    Nests at five beaches near Sirte
    358
    2009, MEDASSET
    Nests at 28 beaches
    550 (2006); 841 (2007)
    MEDASSET

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Record

    • None on record None on record: the area of Qubeiba Beach lost.
    • None on record None on record: the owner of the power plant and the year it was commissioned.
    • Disputed Unclear: the nest counts are not directly comparable between years because the number of beaches surveyed differs (28 beaches in 2006 and 2007; five beaches near Sirte in 2009).

    Did the harm stop?

    Qubeiba Beach was demolished in 2009; the sources reviewed give nest counts for one stretch in 2011 and 2022 but do not say whether Qubeiba nesting resumed.

    Who paid?

    No compensation, fine or funding figure is on record; the UN-funded programme was interrupted by conflict and volunteers continue without funding.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.