Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Introduced and invasive species · Turkey · 1869–2025

Lessepsian invasions: pufferfish in Turkey and bounty payments

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured. Disputed
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 2 insufficient · 2 not measured · 1 disputed See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
Which factor drives the change in Eastern Mediterranean species: the Suez Canal or sea warming?
  • Researchers Research record: Suez accounts for 72% of introductions along the Levant coast; warming accelerates the spread; the share of each factor has not been measured.
  • Government and regulators Egypt (2020 statement): Reported as stating that fewer than 5% of invaders are destructive and that warnings are political.

Since the Suez Canal opened in 1869, hundreds of Red Sea species have entered the Mediterranean. On the Turkish coast, fishers report net damage from pufferfish, and the state pays a bounty for each one removed.

665,000Pufferfish removed under Turkey's bounty scheme, 2020 to end of 2025
Ministry figure as reported by Milliyet; about 13 million TL paid. The size of the pufferfish stock is not known.

Status As of the end of 2025: bounty payments ongoing, with 665,000 pufferfish collected since 2020; no assessment of stock size found.

What?
Red Sea species entering the Mediterranean through the Suez Canal, including pufferfish that fishers on the Turkish coast report damage their nets, and a state bounty paid for each pufferfish removed. MarineInfo
Where?
The Suez Canal in Egypt and the Eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey, including Gökova and the Gulf of Iskenderun.
When?
Canal opened 1869; Turkish pufferfish record 2003; bounty from 2020.
Who?
Gained
  • Egyptian state — Suez Canal revenue of USD 9.4–10.3 billion in 2023; it fell in 2024. Hellenic Shipping News
  • Some Eastern Mediterranean fishers — New commercial species entered markets; at Karataş some Suez-origin species became important resources. International Journal of Aquatic Biology
  • Shippers — The Gulf-to-Rotterdam route is 10,358 km via Suez against 17,975 km via the Cape of Good Hope.
Lost
  • Small-scale south-coast fishers — 92% of those surveyed in 2017 reported net damage.
  • Turkish public budget — About 13 million TL paid in pufferfish bounties, 2020 to end of 2025. Milliyet
Harmed
Why?
The canal links two seas; the sources reviewed do not state a single cause for the change in species, and the shares of Suez and warming are not measured.
How?
Species crossed the canal; Turkey pays fishers per pufferfish tail: 5 TL in 2020, 25 TL or 10 TL in 2024, 35 TL for the spotted pufferfish in 2025. Resmî Gazete
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The Suez Canal opened in 1869 and connected the Red Sea with the Mediterranean. Species that crossed it are called Lessepsian migrants. A compilation by Zenetos and colleagues (2012) counted 986 alien marine species in the Mediterranean; 54% of them arrived "probably" through corridors, mainly the Suez Canal. The count is a record; the pathway attribution is an expert estimate.

There is no single current figure for species that came through Suez. The record shows 204 in 1978 and more than 490 in the 2012 compilation. For Turkey, a count at the end of 2020 listed 539 alien marine species, 58% of Red Sea origin, and Suez accounted for 72% of introductions along the Levant coast.

The effects on fishers differ. A trawl study at Karataş in 2002–03 found that Suez-origin species made up 26.66% of the catch; of the 77 fish and 24 invertebrate species entering the nets, some had become important market resources and some damaged nets and catch. The pufferfish was first recorded in Turkey in 2003, at Gökova. In a 2017 survey of 467 fishers, 92% of small-scale fishers on the south coast said their nets had been damaged; the authors state that the size of the effect is not known.

Turkey began paying fishers for pufferfish in 2020, at 5 TL per tail. In 2024 the rate was 25 TL for the spotted pufferfish and 10 TL for seven other species; in 2025 it was 35 TL for the spotted pufferfish. From 2020 to the end of 2025, 665,000 pufferfish were collected and about 13 million TL was paid. The lionfish was first recorded in Turkey in April 2014, in the Gulf of Iskenderun.

The Suez Canal earned Egypt between USD 9.4 and 10.3 billion in 2023. After attacks in the Red Sea, revenue fell to about USD 4 billion in 2024, with transits dropping from about 26,000 to 13,213 ships, and stood at USD 4.67 billion in fiscal year 2025/26. The Gulf-to-Rotterdam route is 10,358 km via Suez and 17,975 km via the Cape of Good Hope.

  1. 1869Suez Canal opens
  2. 1978204 Suez-origin species recorded in the Mediterranean
  3. 2003Pufferfish first recorded in Turkey, at Gökova
  4. 2012Compilation counts 986 alien marine species in the Mediterranean (Zenetos and others)
  5. 2014Lionfish first recorded in Turkey, in the Gulf of Iskenderun (April)
  6. 2017Survey of 467 fishers: 92% of south-coast small-scale fishers report net damage
  7. 2020Turkey pays 5 TL per pufferfish tail; 539 alien marine species recorded in Turkey by end of year
  8. 2023Suez Canal revenue USD 9.4–10.3 billion
  9. 2024Bounty set at 25 TL (spotted pufferfish) and 10 TL (seven other species); Suez revenue falls to about USD 4 billion
  10. 2025Bounty for spotted pufferfish raised to 35 TL; 665,000 pufferfish collected since 2020

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Which factor drives the change in Eastern Mediterranean species: the Suez Canal or sea warming?
Researchers
Research record

Suez accounts for 72% of introductions along the Levant coast; warming accelerates the spread; the share of each factor has not been measured.

Government and regulators
Egypt (2020 statement)

Reported as stating that fewer than 5% of invaders are destructive and that warnings are political.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The ministry reported 665,000 pufferfish collected and about 13 million TL paid between 2020 and the end of 2025
    Turkish ministry, as reported by Milliyet · Milliyet

Recorded

  • 986 alien marine species in the Mediterranean; 54% probably arrived through corridors, mainly Suez (expert estimate of pathway)
  • Suez-origin species were 26.66% of the catch in trawls at Karataş in 2002–03
  • Bounty per pufferfish: 5 TL in 2020; 25 TL or 10 TL in 2024; 35 TL for the spotted pufferfish in 2025
  • Suez Canal revenue USD 9.4–10.3 billion in 2023; about USD 4 billion in 2024; USD 4.67 billion in 2025/26

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

≈ 13m
Only the bounty payments appear in the record; no other spending on the Mediterranean species is on record.
Public bounty payments for pufferfish removal, 2020 to end of 2025≈ 13m
Reported ministry figure; 665,000 fish collected.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Reached the ground
≈ 13m
Currency: TL · Window: 2020–2025. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • turkey-government (2026): Reported 665,000 pufferfish collected and about 13 million TL paid under the bounty scheme from 2020 to the end of 2025. · Milliyet

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Alien marine species, Mediterranean
986
Zenetos and others, 2012; 54% probably via corridors, mainly Suez
Alien marine species, Turkey
539
End of 2020; 58% of Red Sea origin; Suez explains 72% of Levant introductions
Pufferfish removed
665,000
2020 to end of 2025; stock size not known

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
  • Disputed Which factor drives the change in Eastern Mediterranean species: the Suez Canal or sea warming?

Record

  • None on record The size of the effect of pufferfish on fishing gear: the 2017 survey authors state it is not known.
  • None on record The size of the pufferfish stock: not known, so the share removed by the bounty cannot be stated.
  • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: a claim of EUR 5 million lost by fishers up to 2014, given without a method.
  • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: a claim that 50 million pufferfish were prevented from reproducing, given without a method.
  • Not measured The relative contribution of the Suez Canal and of sea warming to the changes: not measured.
  • None on record The effect of the 13 fish species recorded as crossing: no impact record found.

Did the harm stop?

The spread has not stopped; the pufferfish bounty continued through 2025.

Who paid?

Small-scale south-coast fishers who reported net damage; the Turkish public budget for the bounty payments.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project✓ Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society✓ Researchers

Government and regulators

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.