Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Mining · France · 2015–2019

Lannion Bay shell-sand plan dropped after public resistance

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not measured See the gaps

A permitted shell-sand dredging plan in Lannion Bay, France, was dropped in 2019 after public resistance. The sources reviewed do not describe the environmental effects the dredging would have had.

What?
A 2015 decree permitted shell-sand extraction in Lannion Bay, France; the plan was abandoned in 2019 after public resistance. Reporterre
Where?
Lannion Bay, France Reporterre
When?
2015 decree; plan dropped in 2019 Reporterre
Who?
Gained
  • CAN (Roullier group) — held a 2015 decree permitting up to 250,000 cubic metres a year Reporterre
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
A permit by decree for annual shell-sand extraction of up to 250,000 cubic metres; the company withdrew after opposition. Reporterre
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Reporterre reported that a 2015 decree signed by President Macron allowed CAN, a company of the Roullier group, to extract up to 250,000 cubic metres of shell sand a year in Lannion Bay.

Reporterre reported that CAN abandoned the plan in 2019 after public resistance.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record The sources reviewed do not describe the environmental effects of the planned extraction or the arguments of the opposition.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not say whether the 2015 permit was challenged in court.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.