Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Oil spill · Russia · 2020–2022

Kharyaga field pipeline leak into the Kolva River, October 2020, and court finding of RUB 24 million damage

Nature's voice · report
An oil film lay on my Kolva River in October 2020, seen from aerial reconnaissance by Komi's Ministry of Emergency Management.
Did nature suffer? Yes. Harm is on record. Disputed
Recorded
  • The Usinsk water intake on me was said not to be under threat. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
  • The Naryan-Mar City Court found damage of 24 million rubles to the Russian Federation and to me in 2022. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
What the record lacks: 1 not disclosed · 1 not measured · 4 disputed · 1 unclear See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
How much oil leaked?
  • Press and investigations A source of the Telegram channel Life Shot: 0.9 cubic metres. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
  • Communities and civil society Save Pechora Committee: The volume cannot be determined because rescuers lacked recovery and metering equipment. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
  • Government and regulators Komi's Natural Resources Minister: Gave no figure. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
How serious was the spill?
  • Government and regulators Roman Polshvedkin, Komi's Ministry of Natural Resources: 'Certainly not a disaster'. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
  • Courts Naryan-Mar City Court: Found serious consequences to the Russian Federation and the Kolva River in the amount of 24 million rubles. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
  • Communities and civil society Save Pechora Committee: The emergency was declared 15 hours after the accident was reported and rescuers lacked equipment. 7x7 Horizontal Russia

Oil leaked from an inactive pipeline at the Kharyaga field in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug into the Kolva River in October 2020. In January 2022 the Naryan-Mar City Court convicted an employee and fined the person RUB 240,000, finding damage of RUB 24 million.

RUB 24mDamage found by the Naryan-Mar City Court
Court finding of 24 million rubles of 'serious consequences to the Russian Federation and the Kolva River'; fine of RUB 240,000 on an employee (28 January 2022).

Status As of 28 January 2022: an employee convicted and fined RUB 240,000 by the Naryan-Mar City Court; no payment of the RUB 24 million damage on record.

What?
Oil leaked from an inactive pipeline at the Kharyaga field in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug into the Kolva River in October 2020; in January 2022 a court convicted an employee, fined the person RUB 240,000 and found damage of RUB 24 million. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
Where?
Kharyaginskoye (Kharyaga) oil field in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug; the Kolva River, flowing toward Usinsk in the Komi Republic. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
When?
Leak reported on 17 October 2020; emergency regimes and criminal case on 19 October 2020; verdict on 28 January 2022. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
Harmed
  • Kolva River — Oil film seen from aerial reconnaissance; damage of RUB 24 million found by the court 7x7 Horizontal Russia
Why?
The court found that the defendant broke the approved procedure for cleaning a pipeline section and gave instructions that led to the spill. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
How?
The leak came from an inactive pipeline during technological works; the Investigative Committee opened a case under Article 246 and the Naryan-Mar City Court convicted an employee under Articles 217 and 250 Part 1. 7x7 Horizontal Russia
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

On 17 October 2020 the Save Pechora Committee reported a leak from an inactive oil pipeline at the Kharyaga field in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug; oil reached the Kolva River and flowed toward Usinsk in the Komi Republic. Emergency regimes were imposed in Usinsk and the NAO on 19 October 2020 and the Investigative Committee opened a criminal case under Article 246 of the Criminal Code. A source of the Telegram channel Life Shot put the volume at 0.9 cubic metres; Komi's Natural Resources Minister gave no figure. Four booms were placed, two in the NAO and two in Komi, with a fifth planned, and the film was collected with sorbent.

The Komi Ministry of Emergency Management saw an oil film on the Kolva from aerial reconnaissance, and the Usinsk water intake was said not to be under threat. The Save Pechora Committee criticised officials for declaring the emergency 15 hours after the accident was reported and said rescuers lacked equipment.

On 28 January 2022 the Naryan-Mar City Court convicted an employee under Article 217 (industrial safety rules, major damage by negligence) and Article 250 Part 1 (surface water pollution) and fined the person RUB 240,000. The court found that the defendant broke the approved procedure for cleaning a pipeline section and gave instructions that led to the spill, with 'serious consequences to the Russian Federation and the Kolva River in the amount of 24 million rubles'.

  1. 2020Leak reported by the Save Pechora Committee (17 Oct); emergency regimes in Usinsk and the NAO and criminal case opened under Art. 246 (19 Oct)
  2. 2022Naryan-Mar City Court convicts an employee under Arts. 217 and 250(1) and fines the person RUB 240,000 (28 Jan)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“serious consequences to the Russian Federation and the Kolva River in the amount of 24 million rubles.”

“was certainly not a disaster”

Roman Polshvedkin, head of Komi's Ministry of Natural Resources, on the spill · October 2020 · 7x7 Horizontal Russia

“the main task”

Yuri Bezdudny, Governor of the NAO, on minimising the effects of the spill · October 2020 · 7x7 Horizontal Russia

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Which Lukoil subsidiary was responsible for the pipeline?
Press and investigations
7x7 (19 October 2020), citing a source of Life Shot

Lukoil-Komi reported the spill and Lukoil-Usinskneftegaz took part in the response.

7x7 Horizontal Russia
Courts
Naryan-Mar City Court, as reported by 7x7 (28 January 2022)

The convicted employee worked for Lukoil-Severneftegaz.

7x7 Horizontal Russia
How much oil leaked?
Press and investigations
A source of the Telegram channel Life Shot

0.9 cubic metres.

7x7 Horizontal Russia
Communities and civil society
Save Pechora Committee

The volume cannot be determined because rescuers lacked recovery and metering equipment.

7x7 Horizontal Russia
Government and regulators
Komi's Natural Resources Minister

Gave no figure.

7x7 Horizontal Russia
How serious was the spill?
Government and regulators
Roman Polshvedkin, Komi's Ministry of Natural Resources

'Certainly not a disaster'.

7x7 Horizontal Russia
Courts
Naryan-Mar City Court

Found serious consequences to the Russian Federation and the Kolva River in the amount of 24 million rubles.

7x7 Horizontal Russia
Communities and civil society
Save Pechora Committee

The emergency was declared 15 hours after the accident was reported and rescuers lacked equipment.

7x7 Horizontal Russia

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The spill was 'certainly not a disaster' and the Usinsk water intake was not under threat.
    Komi's Ministry of Natural Resources and Ministry of Emergency Management · 7x7 Horizontal Russia
  • Work was to be done openly, with public information.
    Yuri Bezdudny, Governor of the NAO · 7x7 Horizontal Russia

Recorded

  • The court found that the defendant broke the approved procedure for cleaning a pipeline section and gave instructions that led to the spill.
  • Fine of RUB 240,000 on the acting tool-pusher of Lukoil-Severneftegaz's commercial oil transportation party.
  • Volume of 0.9 cubic metres per a source of the Telegram channel Life Shot; Save Pechora said the volume could not be determined for lack of recovery and metering equipment.
  • No damage amount or affected area was reported at the time of the leak.

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Damage found by the court (to the Russian Federation and the Kolva River)24m
Fine on an employee0.24m
Currency: RUB · Window: 2020–2022. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • lukoil-komi (2020-10-19): Reported the spill, according to a source of the Telegram channel Life Shot cited by 7x7. · 7x7 Horizontal Russia

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2020–2022Claimant wonRUB 0.24m fine
    Criminal case after the October 2020 Kharyaga leak
    Naryan-Mar City Court · Criminal · Investigative Committee (Arkhangelsk Oblast and NAO directorate) → An employee of Lukoil-Severneftegaz (not named in the source)

    The Investigative Committee opened a case under Article 246 of the Criminal Code on 19 October 2020. On 28 January 2022 the Naryan-Mar City Court convicted the defendant under Article 217 (industrial safety rules, major damage by negligence) and Article 250 Part 1 (surface water pollution) and fined the person RUB 240,000. The court found damage of RUB 24 million. 7x7 Horizontal Russia

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Damage found by the court
RUB 24m
'Serious consequences to the Russian Federation and the Kolva River'
Fine on an employee
RUB 240,000
Naryan-Mar City Court, 28 January 2022
Volume leaked
0.9 m3
Per a source of the Telegram channel Life Shot; Save Pechora said it could not be determined

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

Accounts

  • Disputed Which Lukoil subsidiary was responsible for the pipeline?

Record

  • Not measured Not measured: the volume leaked; the Save Pechora Committee said it could not be determined because rescuers lacked recovery and metering equipment.
  • Not disclosed Not disclosed: no damage amount or affected area was reported at the time of the leak (7x7, 19 October 2020).
  • Disputed Disputed: the operator; 7x7 in 2020 cites Lukoil-Komi reporting the spill and Lukoil-Usinskneftegaz taking part in the response, while its 2022 court report names an employee of Lukoil-Severneftegaz.
  • Unclear Unclear: whether and by whom the RUB 24 million was paid.

Did the harm stop?

By 19 October 2020 four booms were in place and the film was being collected with sorbent; emergency regimes were imposed in Usinsk and the NAO the same day.

Who paid?

The court found damage of RUB 24 million and fined an employee of Lukoil-Severneftegaz RUB 240,000; payment of the RUB 24 million is not on record.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

Law and courts

Negligence and gross negligence
Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care. Gross negligence is a serious, reckless failure; under US oil-spill law a finding of gross negligence raises the maximum penalty.