Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Law, regulation and treaties · India · date not stated

India's Supreme Court recalls environmental ruling at developers' request

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 3 insufficient · 1 not measured · 1 unclear See the gaps

Verdictum reported that the Supreme Court recalled an environmental ruling after the Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India applied. Whether construction that started without clearance can be approved later is at stake for nature.

What?
The Supreme Court recalled an environmental ruling at the application of CREDAI, a real estate developers' body. Verdictum
Where?
India; Supreme Court of India. Verdictum
When?
The sources reviewed do not give the date of the recall; the citation is 2025 INSC 1326. Verdictum
Who?
Gained
  • Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India (CREDAI) — Applied for the recall of the ruling Verdictum
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
The recall was made on the application of CREDAI, according to Verdictum. Verdictum
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Verdictum reported that the Supreme Court recalled an environmental ruling on the application of the Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India (CREDAI).

The case is listed as Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India v. Vanashakti, 2025 INSC 1326.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    1. Outcome not on record
      Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India v. Vanashakti
      Supreme Court of India · Civil · Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India → Vanashakti

      Verdictum reported that the Supreme Court recalled an environmental ruling on this application. The outcome of the wider dispute is not stated in the sources reviewed. Verdictum

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Court

    • Unclear Confederation of Real Estate Developers of India v. Vanashakti: outcome not on record.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: the 2017 notification and a 2021 office memorandum allowed developments that had started without clearance to receive approval after the fact.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: in May 2025 the Supreme Court banned after-the-fact clearances, and in November 2025 a three-judge bench reversed that decision by two votes to one.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: a 2026 final ruling kept the 2017 notification as a one-time amnesty and cancelled the 2021 memorandum.
    • None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: the number of developments approved after the fact, their locations or their environmental effects.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.