German top court rules 'climate neutral' claim by Katjes misleading
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
Germany's Federal Court of Justice ruled in June 2024 that Katjes' 'climate neutral' advertising claim was misleading unless the advertisement explained it. The sources reviewed do not say whether the advertisement was changed or any penalty was imposed.
- Katjes — Lost the case; the court found the claim misleading LTO
What happened
Germany's Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ruled on 27 June 2024 that the 'climate neutral' claim in Katjes advertising was misleading. The court found the term vague, so it had to be explained within the advertisement itself.
LTO reported the ruling as a finding on the wording of a Katjes advertisement.
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
- 2024-06-27Claimant wonKatjes 'climate neutral' advertising caseFederal Court of Justice (BGH), Germany · Civil · Not stated in the sources reviewed. → Katjes
The court found the term 'climate neutral' misleading unless the advertisement explained it. LTO
Insurers
What we don't know
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Record
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: a law firm summary of the ruling dated 28 June 2024 was not used as a source.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not say who brought the case, which product was advertised, or whether the advertisement was changed.
- None on record No fine, damages or costs are reported in the sources reviewed.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.