Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Chemical pollution · Peru · 2000

Choropampa mercury spill in Peru, listed in a CAO case file

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 4 none on record · 1 not measured See the gaps

A mercury spill at Choropampa, Peru, is listed with the CAO, the IFC ombudsman. The pollutant named is mercury; the sources reviewed do not describe the spill's effects or any remedy.

What?
Mercury spilled at Choropampa, Peru; a CAO case file is listed for it CAO (IFC/MIGA Compliance Advisor Ombudsman)
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who

What happened

The record, in order.

The CAO, the IFC ombudsman, has a case file listed for the Choropampa mercury spill in Peru [0].

The year 2000 is listed against the spill [0].

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record The quantity of mercury spilled, the number of people affected, and any clean-up or compensation are not stated in the sources reviewed.
    • None on record The company responsible is not named in the sources reviewed; the address of the linked CAO case refers to Yanacocha in Cajamarca.
    • None on record The status and outcome of the CAO case are not stated in the sources reviewed.
    • None on record The exact date of the spill is not stated; 2000 appears only as a year.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    1. Peru Choropampa mercury spill
      CAO (IFC/MIGA Compliance Advisor Ombudsman) · 2000

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.