Cases / Water use · Mexico · date not stated
Senate motion cites Chiapas bottler concession of about 420,000 cubic metres a year
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
A June 2020 Senate gazette entry in Mexico cites a Chiapas water concession of about 420,000 cubic metres a year for a bottler. The stake for nature is who controls the local water supply in Chiapas.
What?
A Senate gazette entry dated 3 June 2020 cites a Chiapas concession for a bottler of about 420,000 cubic metres a year. Mexican Senate (Gaceta del Senado)
Where?
Chiapas, Mexico Mexican Senate (Gaceta del Senado)
When?
Senate gazette entry dated 3 June 2020 Mexican Senate (Gaceta del Senado)
Who?
Gained
- Bottler holding the Chiapas concession (not named in the sources) — concession of about 420,000 cubic metres a year Mexican Senate (Gaceta del Senado)
Lost
None on recordHarmed
None on recordWhy?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Water concession granted to a bottler. Mexican Senate (Gaceta del Senado)
6 of 6 questions answered from the record
What happened
The record, in order.
A Mexican Senate gazette entry dated 3 June 2020 cites a Chiapas concession of about 420,000 cubic metres a year.
The gazette entry is a motion (punto de acuerdo) filed by MORENA, as its document name shows.
In court and with insurers
Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.
Lawsuits and rulings
No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.
Insurers
No insurer decision on record.
What we don't know
Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Record
- None on record The name of the bottler, the term of the concession and the price are not stated in the sources reviewed.
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: that the concession was granted in a city facing water scarcity; the link for this statement is not confirmed.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not say whether the motion led to any decision.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers
Press and investigations
- Senate gazette: MORENA motion on San Cristóbal water concessionMexican Senate (Gaceta del Senado) · 2020-06-03