Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Waste management · Chile · 2019

20,000 tonnes of arsenic-bearing sludge sent to Arica were left exposed

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 2 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

The Ecologist reported in 2019 that a Swedish firm exported toxic waste to Chile, where 20,000 tonnes of sludge were left in the open. The sources reviewed do not report effects on the surrounding environment.

What?
About 20,000 tonnes of arsenic-bearing sludge sent to Arica, Chile, was left in the open. The Ecologist
Where?
Arica, Chile, after export from Sweden. The Ecologist
When?
Sludge reported in March 2019. The Ecologist
Who?
Gained
Lost
  • Claimants (not named in the sources) — paid 3.2 million euros in court costs The Ecologist
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
The waste was exported from Sweden to Arica and left in the open; the sources reviewed do not describe the disposal route. The Ecologist
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The Ecologist reported in March 2019 that 20,000 tonnes of sludge sent to Arica, Chile, was left in the open.

According to the sources reviewed, the sludge was arsenic-bearing.

The sources reviewed say Boliden won the case, and the claimants paid 3.2 million euros in costs.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    1. Defendant won
      Arica sludge case
      · Civil · Claimants (not named in the sources) → Boliden

      The sources reviewed say Boliden won the case and the claimants paid 3.2 million euros in costs. The Ecologist

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: Promel went insolvent.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: the case was dismissed on limitation grounds.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not state the court or the legal ground for the outcome.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not report harm to people or the environment in Arica.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not report whether the sludge has been removed.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

    Bonds and banking

    Liquidation, insolvency, bankruptcy
    Legal processes that apply when a company cannot pay its debts; its assets are sold and claims against it may go unpaid.