Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Genetic resources and benefit-sharing · South Africa · 2020

Rooibos benefit-sharing agreement (South Africa)

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured · 1 disputed See the gaps

A rooibos industry benefit-sharing arrangement in South Africa paid 12.2 million rand to two San and Khoi councils in its first year, set at 1.5% of the farm-gate price. Cultural Survival reported that about 2% of rooibos farmers come from Indigenous communities.

1.5%Benefit-sharing payment as a share of the farm-gate price
As reported in the South African government statement of July 2022; the first-year payment was 12.2 million rand.

Status As of the latest dated sources reviewed (2025): the first-year payment of 12.2 million rand was reported in July 2022; no later payment figure and no court case are on record in the sources reviewed.

What?
A rooibos sector benefit-sharing payment to San and Khoi communities, set at 1.5% of the farm-gate price, with a first-year payment of 12.2 million rand divided equally between two councils. gov.za (South African government)
When?
Payment reported in July 2022; reporting on the arrangement dates from June 2020. gov.za (South African government)
Who?
Gained
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
The sources reviewed do not state the reason or legal basis for the arrangement.
How?
The amount is set at 1.5% of the farm-gate price and divided equally between two councils. gov.za (South African government)
In proportion The payment is 1.5% of the farm-gate price; about 2% of rooibos farmers are from Indigenous communities. Cultural Survival
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

In July 2022 the South African government published a statement on gov.za, titled "Payment of benefits from rooibos to San and Khoi communities a milestone for industrywide collaboration". The statement reported a payment from the rooibos sector to San and Khoi communities.

According to the record reviewed, the benefit-sharing amount was set at 1.5% of the farm-gate price. The first-year payment, in 2022, was 12.2 million rand, divided equally between two councils.

In June 2020 Cultural Survival reported on the arrangement under the headline "Indigenous Peoples to Share In Tea Industry Profits". It reported that about 2% of rooibos farmers come from Indigenous communities and that the Khoi and San are not officially recognised by the state.

Farmer's Weekly reported that rooibos exports were 5,900 tonnes in 2015 and 9,700 tonnes in 2024, and about 10,930 tonnes in 2025.

  1. 2015Rooibos exports at 5,900 tonnes (Farmer's Weekly)
  2. 2020Cultural Survival reports on the arrangement (1 June); reports that about 2% of rooibos farmers come from Indigenous communities and that the Khoi and San are not officially recognised by the state
  3. 2022Government statement (July) reports payment of benefits from rooibos to San and Khoi communities; first-year payment 12.2 million rand, divided equally between two councils
  4. 2024Rooibos exports at 9,700 tonnes
  5. 2025Rooibos exports at about 10,930 tonnes

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“Payment of benefits from rooibos to San and Khoi communities a milestone for industrywide collaboration”

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Is the arrangement a model for benefit-sharing with the Khoi and San?
Government and regulators
DFFE, South Africa

Described the payment as a milestone for industry-wide collaboration.

gov.za (South African government)
Communities and civil society
Cultural Survival

Reported that about 2% of rooibos farmers come from Indigenous communities and that the Khoi and San are not officially recognised by the state.

Cultural Survival

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The agreement was described as the first industry-wide agreement of its kind in the world.
    South Africa's Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) and the Rooibos Council, as recorded · gov.za (South African government)

Recorded

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

12m
Single documented payment; no later-year figure found.
First-year benefit payment to the two councils (divided equally)12m

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Reached the ground
12m
Currency: ZAR · Window: 2022. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • dffe-south-africa (July 2022): Published a statement presenting the payment of benefits from rooibos to San and Khoi communities as a milestone for industry-wide collaboration. · gov.za (South African government)

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Share of the farm-gate price paid as benefit
1.5%
As reported in the July 2022 government statement
First-year payment
12.2 million rand
2022; divided equally between two councils
Indigenous share of rooibos farmers
About 2%
Cultural Survival, June 2020

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

Accounts

  • Disputed Is the arrangement a model for benefit-sharing with the Khoi and San?

Record

  • None on record The amount paid after the first year is not on record in the sources reviewed.
  • Insufficient The government statement and the 1.5% and 12.2 million rand figures are reported through the statement as summarised and were not independently verified.
  • None on record The Khoi and San are reported as not officially recognised by the state (Cultural Survival, 2020); the sources reviewed do not record the state's own position on this.
  • None on record The sources reviewed do not state the legal basis for the arrangement or how the councils spend the payment.

Did the harm stop?

Who paid?

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project✓ Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

Government and regulators

Press and investigations

Communities and civil society