Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Tanker / shipping · New Zealand · 2011

Rena grounding (New Zealand)

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 6 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

The container ship Rena ran aground in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, on 5 October 2011. The sources reviewed give figures for government costs and an insurer settlement, none of which could be checked against a primary document.

NZ$47mGovernment costs reported
Reported figure, not verified against a primary source.

Status The sources reviewed give no date after the 2011 event; current status not established.

What?
Grounding of the Rena in the Bay of Plenty.
Where?
Bay of Plenty, New Zealand.
When?
5 October 2011.
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who

What happened

The record, in order.

The Rena ran aground on 5 October 2011 in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand.

The sources reviewed record figures for the response: government costs of NZ$47 million, a settlement of NZ$27.6 million plus NZ$10.4 million contingent attributed to the Swedish Club, and a statutory liability limit of about NZ$11.3 million. These come from summaries and are listed under unknown as unverified.

An opposition estimate put the shortfall borne by New Zealand taxpayers at about NZ$20 million; this is likewise unverified.

  1. 2011Rena grounds in the Bay of Plenty on 5 October

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • The Rena grounded on 5 October 2011 in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: No independent ecological evaluation is on record.

    Figures

    • Insufficient Government cost: Reported government costs; not verified.
    • Insufficient Settlements: Reported settlement, with NZ$10.4m further contingent (Swedish Club); not verified.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: government costs of NZ$47m.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: a settlement of NZ$27.6m with a further NZ$10.4m contingent, attributed to the Swedish Club.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: a statutory liability limit of about NZ$11.3m.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: an opposition estimate of a taxpayer shortfall of about NZ$20m.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not describe the ecological damage.

    Did the harm stop?

    The sources reviewed do not say.

    Who paid?

    Reported but not verified: part of the cost fell on New Zealand taxpayers.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers