Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Genetic resources and benefit-sharing · International · 2004–2025

FAO Plant Treaty multilateral system and benefit-sharing fund

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 4 insufficient · 2 not measured · 2 disputed See the gaps

Under the Plant Treaty's Multilateral System, 116,763 standard material transfer agreements had been signed by 1 January 2025, while a Third World Network account says only 5 or 6 of more than 25,000 recipients made monetary contributions. Negotiators in Lima in 2025 did not agree on expanding the system.

5–6 of 25,000+Recipients making monetary contributions
Third World Network, July 2025, on standard material transfer agreements signed up to 1 January 2025.

Status As of the Lima session at the end of 2025: expansion of the Multilateral System not agreed; payment, Annex I and DSI deferred to the next session.

What?
The Plant Treaty's Multilateral System supplied genebank material under 116,763 SMTAs by 1 January 2025; Third World Network reported that only 5 or 6 of more than 25,000 recipients paid, and talks on expanding the system did not reach agreement in Lima. Third World Network
Where?
Global; the Governing Body met in Lima, Peru. Vision IAS
When?
Fund collecting since 2009; SMTA data to 1 January 2025; Lima session at the end of 2025. FAO
Who?
Gained
  • Recipients of genebank material under SMTAs — Access to material; payment required only if the product is not available to others for research. Third World Network
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
The sources reviewed record disagreement between Global North and Global South delegations over expanding the crop list and mandatory payment for digital sequence information, and over payment rates. Down To Earth
How?
Material is supplied under an SMTA; payment is required only when the product is not available without restriction to others for research. Third World Network
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (the Plant Treaty) operates a Multilateral System that covers 35 food crops and 29 forage crops. Genebank material is supplied under a standard material transfer agreement (SMTA). A Benefit-sharing Fund (BSF) receives payments.

According to FAO's 2025 report, 116,763 SMTAs had been signed by 1 January 2025, with providers in 69 countries and recipients in 189 countries, an average of 17 SMTAs a day.

Third World Network wrote in July 2025 that payment under the SMTA is required only if the product is not available to others without restriction for research, and that of more than 25,000 recipients only 5 or 6 made monetary contributions. It reported that the BSF had received about $30 million since 2009, more than 97% of it voluntary and about 90% from governments.

At the Governing Body's eleventh session in Lima, held at the end of 2025, a package to expand the Multilateral System was not agreed. Payment, the list of covered crops (Annex I) and digital sequence information (DSI) were deferred to the twelfth session. Down To Earth reported that the Global North wanted to expand Annex I and prevent mandatory DSI payments, and that the Global South rejected the consensus text. Third World Network reported proposed payment rates ranging from 0.01% to 0.5% of seed sales and a best case for an expanded system of about $7 million a year.

  1. 2009Benefit-sharing Fund begins collecting; about $30 million received since
  2. 2025By 1 January: 116,763 SMTAs signed; Third World Network reports 5–6 paying recipients (10 July)
  3. 2025Governing Body session in Lima fails to agree on expanding the Multilateral System; payment, Annex I and DSI deferred to the next session

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

What share of seed sales should companies pay into the Benefit-sharing Fund under an expanded system?
Government and regulators
North America (proposal)

0.01% of a company's seed sales.

Third World Network
Government and regulators
Norway and Africa (proposals)

0.1% of seed sales.

Third World Network
Government and regulators
Latin America (proposal)

0.5% of seed sales.

Third World Network
Should the system cover more crops and require payment for digital sequence information?
Government and regulators
Global North delegations

Wanted to expand Annex I and prevent mandatory DSI payments, according to Down To Earth.

Down To Earth
Government and regulators
Global South delegations

Rejected the consensus text, according to Down To Earth.

Down To Earth

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • 116,763 SMTAs signed by 1 January 2025; providers in 69 countries, recipients in 189 countries; average 17 SMTAs a day
    • More than 25,000 recipients; 5–6 made monetary contributions
    • Payment proposals for an expanded system: 0.01% of seed sales (North America) to 0.5% (Latin America); best case about $7 million a year
    • Lima Governing Body session: expansion package not agreed; payment, Annex I and DSI deferred

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What nature saw

    Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

    Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

    SMTAs signed
    116,763
    By 1 January 2025 (FAO)
    Recipients paying
    5–6
    Of more than 25,000 recipients (Third World Network)
    Money received by the Benefit-sharing Fund
    About $30 million
    Since 2009; over 97% voluntary

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Accounts

    • Disputed What share of seed sales should companies pay into the Benefit-sharing Fund under an expanded system?
    • Disputed Should the system cover more crops and require payment for digital sequence information?

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: the first user payment to the fund came in 2018 from Nunhems, $119,083, about 0.77% of its sales of 10 vegetable varieties in the United States.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: six seed companies contributed $824,680 in total, 89% of it from one firm (summary of a Centre for Science and Environment briefing).
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: an earlier package to expand the Multilateral System also failed in 2019.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: the ratio of paying recipients to SMTAs signed (about 0.005%) was calculated for this record, not stated by a source.
    • Not measured No independent evaluation of where Benefit-sharing Fund money was spent is recorded in the sources reviewed.
    • None on record No court case is recorded in the sources reviewed.

    Did the harm stop?

    Who paid?

    The sources reviewed record that the Benefit-sharing Fund is funded more than 97% by voluntary contributions and about 90% by governments; payment by seed users under the SMTA is required only when the product is not available to others for research.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project✓ Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers