Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Finance, funds and markets · Brazil · 2006

Eliasch Amazon land purchase

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not measured · 1 disputed See the gaps

In 2006 Johan Eliasch said he had bought about 160,000 hectares in the Brazilian Amazon. An executive of the seller said the legal entitlement was 45,511 hectares.

about 160,000 ha vs 45,511 haArea claimed vs legal title
As stated in 2006 by the buyer and by an executive of the seller.

Status As of 2006 reporting: area dispute between the buyer's claim and the seller's executive's account; no later status in the sources reviewed.

What?
A purchase of Amazon land whose size was stated differently by the buyer and by a seller's executive. New Statesman
Where?
The Brazilian Amazon. New Statesman
When?
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
The sources reviewed do not state the buyer's reasons.
How?
Purchase from a land and timber company, per the record.
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who

What happened

The record, in order.

In 2006 Johan Eliasch said he had bought about 160,000 hectares in the Amazon. According to an executive of the selling company, the legal entitlement was 45,511 hectares (New Statesman, 2006).

In the same year the New Statesman published a long read under the title "Green colonials" covering the purchase.

  1. 2006Eliasch says he bought about 160,000 ha; a seller's executive says legal title was 45,511 ha; New Statesman publishes "Green colonials"

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

How large was the area bought?
Company or project
Johan Eliasch (buyer)

Said he had bought about 160,000 hectares.

New Statesman
Company or project
An executive of the selling company

Said the legal entitlement was 45,511 hectares.

New Statesman

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The purchase of about 160,000 hectares of Amazon land.
    Johan Eliasch, 2006 · New Statesman

Recorded

  • Legal entitlement of 45,511 hectares, according to an executive of the selling company.

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Area claimed
about 160,000 ha
Stated by the buyer, 2006
Legal entitlement
45,511 ha
Stated by an executive of the seller

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

Accounts

Record

  • None on record The sources reviewed do not state the price or the terms of the purchase.
  • None on record The sources reviewed do not state what became of the area or its forest after the purchase.

Did the harm stop?

The sources reviewed do not say.

Who paid?

The sources reviewed do not say.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

Press and investigations

  1. Green colonials
    New Statesman · 2006-11

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

Science and environment

Hectare (ha)
A unit of area equal to 10,000 square metres, about 2.5 acres. 100 hectares make one square kilometre.